From: matus [matus@snet.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:37 PM To: matus@snet.net Subject: MFD List - Telomere Technology: The End of Mortality (All, this is an interesting article about Telomeres and their relation to aging. It is very propable that we may see the end to the disease known as aging, and the ability to manipulate the telemore gene may be one of the keys. - Mike) Telomere Technology The End of Mortality by Bill Walker from - http://freedom.orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/telomere.htm Ever since Gilgamesh, men have searched for herbal and then chemical means to treat the terminal genetic illness we call old age. Most of the efforts were fruitless because no one knew what "old age" really was in a chemical sense. Now we know. The era of fixed lifespans is over. Your life is now determined by your access to telomere modification technology and your will to use it. For those who haven't spent the last few years running DNA gels, telomeres are the DNA at the very tip of each chromosome. This DNA does not "say" anything in the genetic code because it contains no "start" codons or promoters; it just repeats "TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG . . ." and so on for about 20,000 "letters" (base pairs) in a young human being. This telomeric DNA is essential for all eukaryotic (chromosome-containing, i.e. everything above bacteria) cells. It forms a protective cap at the tip of each chromosome that keeps chromosomes from fusing with other chromosomes at the tips. Without telomeres, chromosomes can't maintain their individuality. Fused chromosomes also have trouble dividing and separating into daughter cells. Like a society without property rights, a cell without telomeres quickly breaks down and quits functioning properly. Most of your body cells ("somatic cells", in correct mad scientist jargon) are steadily losing their telomeres. Each time they divide, your cells don't replicate the last 50-150 base pairs of the telomere. So your telomeres keep shortening, from 20,000 DNA base pairs or so at birth to below 5,000 base pairs. At some critical point your cells will 'senesce'. Senescent cells can continue to live for a long time, but they can't divide again. Eventually the random terrorism of entropy kills them, whether from oxidative damage or DNA repair error. When you run low on functional cells in essential systems like artery endothelium, you die. Why has this programmed-self-destruct-bomb-in-each-cell system evolved? Well, the Gilgamesh Epic (and those from whom the gods receive daily guidance today) would tell you that "The gods gave death to mankind and kept life for themselves." This can never be ruled out; perhaps we are at the nonexistent mercy of immortal and all-powerful sadists. But those of us who take our paranoia less personally would say that the telomere system exists because there is a conflict of interest between individual cells and organisms. Much as politicians evolve to take an ever-increasing share of the resources and interns of a society for their own reproduction while producing nothing in return, individual cells can turn cancerous and pursue their own interests. This is a constant threat to any multicellular organism. The bigger and longer-lived the living thing, the more chance for one cell to mutate into a cancer. (One implication of this is that Bowhead whales, which are the third-heaviest whale and live 200 years, undoubtedly have much more advanced anti-cancer genes than humans. Maybe we should stop the Inuit from exterminating the ancient Bowheads with rocket harpoons from motorboats.) Each cell has complicated systems to detect genetic deviation and kill itself by cell suicide, but with enough mutations these systems may be bypassed. So like the replicants in Blade Runner, each of our body cells has been given a fixed life span, or rather a fixed number of possible divisions. When a human cell collects the necessary series of mutations in the p53 and p16 checkpoints that are supposed to send a cell with irreversibly damaged DNA into cell suicide ('apoptosis'), it may go out of control and start to form a tumor. But eventually the cells in this tumor will run out of telomere and senesce. We call this "spontaneous remission." Presumably this often happens inside the body and is never even noticed. Now, not quite every cell works this way. Germ-line cells, sperm- and egg-producing cells, have to extend the telomeres of the sperm and egg back to the correct length for a young organism (or the species would die out in one generation.) So these cells have an enzyme called telomerase that extends telomeres by adding more TTAGGG repeats at the end of the chromosome, independent of the normal system of DNA replication. To further complicate matters, stem cells (the cells that make other cells for repair and maintenance purposes, like the white-blood-cell-manufacturing cells in the bone marrow) also activate telomerase some of the time. Of course every cell has all the same genes as every other cell, because we all start out as single-celled organisms. Skin cells have the same genes as brain cells, but different genes are turned on to make different kinds of cells. So every cell contains the gene for telomerase... and if a cancer cell can turn that telomerase gene on the cancer becomes immortal. It can divide until it kills you. In fact it can divide a lot longer than that; we have HeLa cells still growing in our lab that killed someone named Henrietta L. back in the 50s. So there are two themes in telomere modification. One is to lengthen the telomeres of old somatic cells to reverse aging or cure other genetic diseases with engineered cells. The other is to shorten telomeres in cancer cells and kill them. Both of these objectives have been achieved in the laboratory. Longer Telomeres To engineer longer telomeres, we remove a few cells from a patient. Then we use a virus to carry a telomerase gene into the cells. Now all these cells already have a telomerase gene, but it is "off" because the DNA upstream of it has the wrong promoter sequence, one that is not turned on in that type of cell. The telomerase gene that we carry in with the virus has a different promoter, one that is expressed. We can use anything from a virus promoter (sort of like a molecular Don King), which screams "TRANSCRIBE ME!" a thousand times more loudly than human promoters, or we can use a weaker promoter and get a slower rate of telomerase molecule production. Two kinds of engineering viruses are commonly used. Retroviruses insert the telomerase gene randomly into a chromosome. Of course this occasionally kills a cell by cutting an important gene, but most of the cells survive. (The retrovirus is always provided with an antibiotic resistance gene so that non-infected cells can be killed off in culture, leaving pure telomerized cells.) It doesn't matter much anyway since telomerase-active cells can be grown in culture forever until you have as many as the patient needs. After a large population of cells is produced, other genes may be introduced to fix genetic diseases, like the gene for the mutant protein that causes muscular dystrophy. Then we can use another retrovirus which produces a protein which selectively excises the telomerase gene. At this point we have a supply of longer-telomere, rejuvenated and genetically repaired cells ready to reinstall into the patient. Since these cells carry the patient's own MHC genes, they will not be rejected like foreign transplants. This sort of technique could cure Duchenne's muscular dystrophy, AIDs-induced depletion of T cells, and other scarcities of specialized cell types. Many aging syndromes are caused by depletion of critical cell types. Adenoviruses are used to carry telomerase (hTERT) into cells, but the adeno-hTERT virus doesn't install any genes into the chromosomes. Adeno-hTERT just sits in the cell producing telomerase, lengthening the telomeres in the originally infected cells. The longer telomeres (but not the virus, which eventually succumbs to cellular enzymes... we hope) are then passed on to daughter cells. Both viral techniques kill some cells, so are not the ultimate easy answer for whole-body telomere restoration. For that we need a way, perhaps an artificial hormone, to temporarily "turn on" the telomerase in each older cell. Study on this is under way. But the current viral techniques mean that a healthy 200- year-old need not run out of any cell type that can easily be removed and cultured. All you need is a cell culture hood and a few incubators in a country with no FDA. None of the viral techniques we have now are likely to be FDA-approved before the protons decay (i.e. a long time), because they involve using the patient's own cells. Thus every patient uses different cells, so every patient needs his or her own personal FDA approval. Buddy, can you spare $820 million (Tufts University estimate of average FDA approval cost)? Since the only advantage to short telomeres is better cancer control, when cancer is cured (see the next section) we won't need short telomeres. Then children (and eventually adults, with more difficulty) can be engineered with telomeres like current-day lab mice, 100,000 base pairs long, giving humans inherent life spans like those of the Bibical patriarchs or the Sumerian demigods. Perhaps this will create people that actually care about solving the big environmental problems (like asteroid impacts.) Pinky and the Brain's Telomeres This brings up a little aside about government lab mice. They've been selected for a century by intensively breeding them for only eight months in a low-selection environment.... anyway, however it happened, their telomeres are over five times as long as those of real animals. So most of the cancer studies done on mice were compromised; lab mice get cancer really easily because of their long telomeres. The common lab mouse isn't good for toxicity studies, either; they're too resistant. Are you shocked that large amounts of tax money went down a research dead end? Neither is anyone else. Shorter Telomeres To cure cancer in a dish, we can use what are called "antisense oligos" to bind to the RNA molecules that have to be translated into protein to make the active telomerase molecules. This knocks out telomerase in all the cells, allowing the telomeres to shorten and the cells to senesce. Except for the (fortunately small) percentage of cancer types that go into the ALT pathway, which is another system of telomere lengthening that doesn't use telomerase. (I hate cancer cells, but you have to admire their persistence and ingenuity.) Suffice to say that killing cancer this way isn't 100% effective on every cancer but may be a good adjunct therapy someday, since it only affects telomerase-positive cells. In an adult human, the only telomerase- positive cells are sperm-producing cells (eggs are all made in fetal females and saved for a lifetime), and some of the currently active stem cells. So an antitelomerase treatment might at worst sterilize a male while curing his cancer (of course some testicular cells could be removed first.) A faster and more promising anti-telomerase technique is to use a lethal adenovirus with the telomerase promoter instead of the normal "Don King" viral super-promoter. This means that the viral genes will only be transcribed in cells which are expressing telomerase, again killing only male germ-line cells and a proportion of stem cells. Again because of the existence of the ALT pathway, not every cancer is completely eradicated. But many are, and this technique has the advantage that the same adenovirus can be used on everyone. So only one $820 million FDA approval will be needed. Your Telomeres There are things you can do to help your telomeres stay at their optimum length longer. Oxidative damage can increase the rate of telomere shortening (not to mention damaging your mitochodrial DNA, which works like bacterial DNA . . . oops, better leave that for another article.) So taking a good mix of antioxidants can slow down aging to some degree. Go to Pubmed and read Bruce Ames' latest papers on alpha-lipoic acid. But in the long run, only a legal regime that allows companies to provide you with telomere-controlling technologies can solve your telomere problems. Gilgamesh never did get his telomeres under control in 3000 BC. After many adventures, he found a rejuvenating herb, but a snake stole it and dived into a deep well with it. We have a snake problem too, and the life-stealing snake's name is FDA. Too many biological technologies are lying at the bottom of the regulatory well, and there isn't enough money on the planet to fill the well and float them out. We have telomeres under control in the lab dish, in the cloned cow, and other places that do your personal telomeres no good. Your telomeres should be under your control. They are not the only puzzle that must be solved to reach the end of Gilgamesh's quest, but they are an important piece of the puzzle. There is no reason that you shouldn't live to be 200, like a Bowhead whale or like Utnapishtim (the Sumerian Noah... well, actually Noah is the more recent story's Utnapishtim). Perhaps two more centuries of technology will bring enough progress to fix the rest of your mortal ailments. It is certain that the inevitability of human mortality at a certain age is over. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Bio: Bill Walker works as a hunchbacked assistant in the Shay-Wright telomere lab at UT Southwestern Medical Center (http://www.swmed.edu/home_pages/cellbio/shay-wright/index.html). Every day he lengthens the telomeres of cells in culture while his own telomeres shorten inexorably. www.matus1976.com - Article archives www.matus1976.com - Article archives